New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Internet addiction: symptom or disorder?
(June 2008 Issue)

By Nan Shnitzler

Research has been sparse, but case reports are rich in evidence that problematic Internet use can tip into the pathological. As a result, a diagnosis around Internet addiction is being considered for the fifth edition of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders" published by the American Psychiatric Association.

Maressa Orzack, Ph.D., director of the Computer Addiction Study Center at McLean Hospital in Belmont, Mass., told New England Psychologist two years ago that she was "swamped" with clients and e-mails, and problems have gotten worse since then. She has advocated for a DSM category related to Internet addiction.

Nashua, N.H., psychologist Carl Hindy, Ph.D., says more clients are seeking help with Internet addiction but disagrees it should be codified as a diagnostic entity.

About half his practice is couples counseling and the Internet is a factor in about a third of the cases. It usually surfaces as a contributor to communication break-downs and intimacy issues. It becomes more of a problem when a partner brushes the family aside for a simulated life on The Sims or Second Life.

"When needs and gratifications and fulfillment are met over a computer at the expense of face to face interactions, it begins to cross the defining line of addiction," Hindy says.

Hindy suggests excessive Internet use is a coping mechanism and a form of self-comfort that can become addictive, though he doesn't like the word. He fears an "Internet addiction" diagnosis in DSM could ultimately limit treatment if not enough of the diagnostic criteria are manifested.

"The idea was that diagnostic categories exist for the purpose of making better predictions which you can test with research," Hindy says. "The heterogeneity of the Internet and its users makes it difficult to come up with good predictions to test."

"I'm on all the [insurance] plans and I've never wanted an Internet addiction diagnosis to provide treatment. I'm treating the underlying issues," Hindy adds.

Yale associate professor of psychiatry Marc N. Potenza, M.D., Ph.D. is an addiction psychiatrist who studies the intersection of substance dependence and impulse control disorders, one of them being Internet dependency.

"There does appear to be an association between problematic Internet use and adverse measures of functioning, particularly mood disorders like depression," Potenza says. "So I think more research needs to be done to try to define appropriate diagnostic criteria and to examine those criteria with respect to prevalence and understanding the clinical impact."

Parsing Internet addiction is made difficult by the dearth of legitimate studies (most research has been done in South Korea), the overlaps between Internet-enabled compulsions like gaming, sexual behavior and social networking, and co-morbidities.

William E. Narrow, M.D., M.P.H., a DSM research director, says a growing chorus is calling for an examination of Internet behaviors but it remains to be seen where it will be grouped. Pathological gambling is the only behavioral addiction listed in DSM-IV. Internet addiction shares symptoms with several groups. When certain symptoms could go either way, the DSM workgroups look at the underlying neurobiology to distinguish one disorder from another.

"For a lot of psychiatry, neurobiology is really the key question and one of the validators the workgroups use to look at groupings of disorders," Narrow says. "For example, are there similarities in neurocognitive processes; are there temperamental antecedents common to this group?"

Dave Greenfield, Ph.D, of the Center for Internet Behavior in West Hartford, Conn. says that while Internet abuse is a unique and new phenomenon, it is similar in action to other "mood altering and consciousness shifting behaviors."

"It is important to note that any behavior, whether substance-based or behavioral, is maintained by powerful reinforcement contingencies with clear neurochemical implications," Greenfield says in an e-mail. "Addiction and compulsive behavior is not new. The unconscious need to numb ourselves has been around since civilization began."

PsychCentral.com publisher, Mass.-based John M. Grohol, Psy.D., thinks clinicians need to dig deeper to understand how excessive time online is playing a role in people's lives, rather than labeling it as inherently dysfunctional.

"The Internet is a brand new type of resource that we have to understand and deal with," Grohol says. "Most people learn to incorporate the Internet in their lives. But some who can't get over the sheer amount of information and enjoy playing games may do so at the expense of other things. There's no need to add another diagnosis to incorporate that - because we already have plenty of diagnoses to choose from."