New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Maine implements managed care program
(April 2008 Issue)

By Ami Albernaz

Eighteen years after a consent decree laid out the basic requirements for Maine's mental health care system, fulfilling these requirements given a squeezed budget continues to dominate the state's healthcare priorities.

As reported in the New England Psychologist in November 2006 and January 2007, the matter of whether the state's mental health services meet the standards set forth in the decree has come before court several times since it was issued in 1990. The decree, which followed complaints about the quality of treatment at the former Augusta Mental Health Institute, called for the development of individual treatment plans and the establishing of a comprehensive system of community-based care, among other changes.

Now, the state is deemed to be 80 percent in compliance, says Maine Department of Health and Human Services Commissioner Brenda Harvey. Resources have recently been bolstered in areas including vocational services, housing and "warm lines" (peer support telephone hotlines) that had been rated inadequate by the court master.

Harvey calls the increased compliance "a real positive step," while adding the challenge will be to sustain the gains within a tightly constrained budget. "The question will be, can Maine sustain these given the current fiscal climate?" she says.

To contain costs and assure a base level of services, Maine implemented a managed care program for behavioral health services in December. Though the state has a large number of individual not-for-profit providers compared to other states, "it's difficult to assure that they provide coordinated, sufficient care to individuals," Harvey says. The goal of managed care is to stop people from "falling between the cracks."

APS Healthcare, the Silver Spring, Maryland company that is running Maine's managed care program, is now conducting a utilization review for the state. "We're basically putting our toes into the water this year," Harvey says. "When we have data telling us if people are in too-high cost service or insufficient-cost service, we'll be able to adjust accordingly." While it is too early to gauge how managed care is working, she says a preliminary report looks promising.

Some psychologists, meanwhile, are concerned about managed care's impact on reimbursement rates and ultimately, on the clients they serve. A computer problem that started in 2005 has delayed payment, sometimes by months, to psychologists treating people on MaineCare, Maine's Medicaid system. Though managed care is a separate issue, many psychologists fear that "more administrative hoops" will further bog down the system, says Sheila Comerford, executive director of the Maine Psychological Association (MePA).

"Reimbursement rates were always low, but now that there's a managed care system, they're saying, 'I'm done,'" she says. A survey the association sent to psychologists late last year indicated that 60 percent of respondents who see MaineCare clients would no longer do so. "I think the ramifications for service will be severely compromised," Comerford says.

She adds, however, that she is optimistic a solution can be reached. She has asked the head of APS in Maine to attend MePA's next Policy Council meeting and says he is willing to help psychologists "make the managed-care process as painless as possible."

"We're taking a wait-and-see approach," Comerford says.

Meanwhile, a proposal that would increase reimbursements for psychologists is before legislature, Harvey says.

Also new in Maine are revised licensing regulations issued by the State Board of Examiners of Psychologists. Among the areas significantly changed are continuing education requirements, which now call for three hours in ethics and 20 hours "in the licensee's current areas of practice or anticipated areas of future practice." Another new requirement is that non-accredited academic programs include at least two years of full-time residency at the educational institution with face-to-face instruction.