New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Missouri psychologists close to earning prescriptive privileges
(March 2008 Issue)

By Phyllis Hanlon

Missouri might soon join New Mexico and Louisiana in winning the right for prescriptive privileges (RxP).

Dan Abrahamson, Ph.D., assistant executive director of state advocacy for professional practice at the American Psychological Association notes that the battle for prescriptive privileges has been waging for the last two decades.

In the Show-Me State, Marci Manna, Psy.D., chair of Missouri's RxP Task Force, Mark Skrade, Psy.D., president of the Missouri Psychological Association (MOPA) and Roy Holand, M.D. and former state representative, have worked tirelessly to garner support for the bill. Manna reports that 85 percent of the 1,400 psychologists in the state support the bill and 85 members of the House have co-sponsored the bill.

Also, the Missouri Families for Access to Comprehensive Treatment, a group of 500 citizens, has joined the effort. "[The group] exists to support our legislation," says Manna. "They are working to get on a listserv. It looks favorable this year."

In Missouri, patients often have to wait an average of eight months and must travel great distances to see a psychiatrist, according to Manna. Although general practitioners offer some respite, she says they are often unfamiliar and inexperienced with psychological issues and specific psychopharmacological treatment. "They rely on us for help with mental illness issues," says Manna.

Missouri launched efforts to gain prescriptive privileges in the 1990s but failed to earn sufficient support from the psychological community. The current campaign began five years ago and has managed to survive several legislative hearings.

While 80 percent of Missouri's psychologists now favor RxP, external factors still pose a challenge. "The biggest obstacle is medicine," says Manna. However, their efforts to block the legislation are "not highly organized," she adds. "They would send a token psychiatrist [to meetings] who wouldn't even know what the bill is about," she says. "There is a lot of misinformation and miseducation among medical professionals. They don't understand the details."

To opponents of the psychologist's right to prescribe, Manna says, "Our main platform is that [prescribing] is done in the context of therapy. We want to get patients off meds."

Abrahamson applauds Missouri's efforts and says, "The Missouri folks are doing a great job. They are committed and organized. They've done their homework and are developing an effective relationship with the legislature."

He also notes that the Missouri legislature "appears to be more knowledgeable and sophisticated about the arguments made by organized medicine." He says, "they know that their assertions that giving psychologists prescriptive privileges will have disastrous consequences are not accurate."

Abrahamson emphasizes that as more and more psychologists earn and use their prescriptive rights, history and data show that they can prescribe safely and effectively. "There are hundreds of counties in the country that have no psychiatrists. We have a solution to one important part of a healthcare problem in the country," he says.

Should the bill (House Bill 1739 and Senate Bill 917) earn legislative approval, prescribing rights in Missouri would become effective Aug. 28, 2008.